CleanTechnica•about 14 hours ago
Why Would Someone Prefer Coal Power Over Solar & Wind?
Key Takeaway
Despite significant subsidies for legacy coal, the increasing adoption of renewable energy across diverse states signals a persistent market shift that developers and large power consumers must navigate.
AI Summary
- •A new $700 million US subsidy is being allocated to existing coal power plants, indicating continued policy support for legacy fossil fuel infrastructure.
- •Several traditionally 'red' states, including Missouri, Arkansas, Ohio, Mississippi, Michigan, Arizona, Louisiana, and Wyoming, are reportedly increasing their adoption of renewable energy.
- •The article highlights an ongoing tension between policy efforts to support coal and the accelerating market shift towards solar and wind power, even in states historically reliant on fossil fuels.
Topics
emissionspolicysolarwind
Article Content
As I was reading through Steve Hanley’s article on the absurd new $700 million US subsidy for old, dirty coal, the ending really struck me. Here are his final words there: “Other red states joining the renewable energy party include Missouri, Arkansas, Ohio, Mississippi, Michigan, Arizona, Louisiana, and Wyoming. “And ... [continued] The post Why Would Someone Prefer Coal Power Over Solar & Wind? appeared first on CleanTechnica .