Trump’s attack on UN shipping deal is a harbinger of what’s to come. Here’s how countries can still get climate action done.
Key Takeaway
The US government's active undermining of international climate agreements signals a challenging global policy landscape, pushing countries and industries to pursue climate action through alternative, potentially domestic or regional, pathways.
AI Summary
- •The US government actively opposed and undermined an international UN shipping emissions deal, signaling potential future resistance to global climate agreements.
- •This action creates significant uncertainty for international climate policy and carbon pricing mechanisms, potentially shifting focus to national or regional climate initiatives.
- •The article suggests that countries will need to pursue alternative pathways for climate action, likely through domestic policies, bilateral agreements, or private sector initiatives, despite international headwinds.
- •For developers and large power consumers, this highlights increased policy risk at the international level and emphasizes the importance of understanding and adapting to national/sub-national climate policy frameworks.
Topics
Article Content
By William Todts The UN’s International Maritime Organization is not normally a place that grabs the headlines. But the scenes that unfolded in London earlier this month were unprecedented. The US government, led by the President and his secretary of state, invested enormous political capital to threaten, cajole and intimidate ... [continued] The post Trump’s attack on UN shipping deal is a harbinger of what’s to come. Here’s how countries can still get climate action done. appeared first on CleanTechnica .